Relapse and Recovery at Community Leadership Summit
4 Comments
Thanks for your run-down of moderating. I think the point about engaging taking time is a classic; no doubt I'll pick that up from you. Sounds like you did a lot checking in with people, and kept thing moving along well. I always appreciate good leadership in a social venue @Jenna--the topic proposals (by all) were pretty specific and I thought all the presenters/moderators did a really good job of staying on topic. In the Social Media Snake Oil session, I had everyone introduce themselves and give one problem that they wanted to resolve. That took 20 minutes and the ONLY reason I did was to illustrate viscerally the core problem that 80% of the attendees were there to resolve--that social media takes *time*, and the very simple act of meeting and greeting people in a community takes a certain amount of time. Of course, engaging people deeper takes even MORE time. So I did the introductions as an exercise to illustrate the takeaway point that at least 30% of a CM's time can easily be spent in engagement, *at a minimum*. (and to plan your day accordingly!) For the rest of that session and all of the second one, the classroom teacher in me came out. I laid out 3 points I wanted to make, asked for a show of hands if that's what people were there for to get a quick consensus. Moderating the session, I let folks know that we might have to limit some discussion if we wanted to get to the 3 points based on time. (ie: we had 15 minutes to talk about topic 1, 20 minutes on topic 2, 20 minutes on topic 3) If we got too far off track, I'd try to bring the discussion back on topic, or I would ask the group if this was the direction they wanted to go, at the expense of getting to the other points. MY takeaway was that 3 points is at least 1 too many. My hope (and check in with the group) was that everyone would get at least ONE practical, useful tip or bit of knowledge that would help them in their job on Monday. Roughly 80% of the folks in the group said they got that, either by a show of hands or actual feedback. I think a moderator needs to be able to walk a really fine line of allowing people their voice/input, AND not letting them stray or keep repeating themselves. I was lucky that there were a lot of people who wanted to give input, and this group of people could see others wanting to talk, so they were very respectful of having their say and then giving way for more input. You've got to have a little bit of talk-show host in you, I guess, and remember that it's MY panel, but the guests are what makes the show interesting. It's the moderator's job to bring out the best in the guests. Welcome back - it's always good to hear what you have to say. I'd be interested in hearing more about how you went about hosting the sessions. Sometimes when I've been to unconferences, the person who proposes the topic essentially asks everyone to say what they'd like to talk about (which can take a lot of time), rather than first positioning the topic in a framework. I've found that pretty ineffective, so it would be good to hear how you did it differently to get a good result. Thanks for the kind words, Mark! Much appreciated, and so glad you could make it! |
test announcement
hello
Poll
What's the BEST Community ROI metric?
Community Participation
Votes:
5
Archives
Blogroll
Categories
The Social Net Recent Entries
37,173
Views
| 
1 Comment
29,384
Views
| 
No Comments
18,981
Views
| 
No Comments
4,488
Views
| 
No Comments
|
||||||

Digg 
test announcement
